<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Network Pages will be discontinued soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intrepid.com.au/facebook-network-pages-will-be-discontinued-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intrepid.com.au/facebook-network-pages-will-be-discontinued-soon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Schlinker</title>
		<link>http://www.intrepid.com.au/facebook-network-pages-will-be-discontinued-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Schlinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intrepid.com.au/?p=95#comment-528</guid>
		<description>James, I&#039;m confident your wrong. That doesn&#039;t mean that other individuals haven&#039;t / won&#039;t reach the same conclusion as you regarding this -- but just because a large group of people reach the same answer doesn&#039;t mean it is correct.

If Facebook was concerned with the amount of storage space they were using, they would be limiting the number of picture albums or something similar. Removing the network pages, which are dynamically generated and probably take a few GBs of storage on a SQL server somewhere is nothing compared to the total amount of data which Facebook stores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I&#8217;m confident your wrong. That doesn&#8217;t mean that other individuals haven&#8217;t / won&#8217;t reach the same conclusion as you regarding this &#8212; but just because a large group of people reach the same answer doesn&#8217;t mean it is correct.</p>
<p>If Facebook was concerned with the amount of storage space they were using, they would be limiting the number of picture albums or something similar. Removing the network pages, which are dynamically generated and probably take a few GBs of storage on a SQL server somewhere is nothing compared to the total amount of data which Facebook stores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
